The Second Declaration of Indepencence

Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Stop feeding the monster before it eats you.

Stop feeding the monster before it eats you.

Every time I hear someone say that the government needs money to operate, I shudder and wonder how people can be so ignorant of reality. Sure, the federal government does need a certain amount of money to run things like the military and capital hill but the bulk or the majority of government services should be for one, actual people oriented services and second should be administered locally, not nationally as explained and set forth by the Constitution.

The idea that government needs the money and uses it for the good of the people is preposterous at best and wishful thinking by those ignorant of economics and what the meaning of freedom is.

Ask any citizen to name a dozen of their favorite “federal government agencies” and what it is that these agencies do for them and they will have great difficulty with even naming a few. Most will name the fire department and police which are city, county or state.

Now consider that the government has grown to well over 1200 agencies, that most of us don’t have a clue what they do, and has millions of government employees to drain the tax base and you can see the scope of the problem.

Not only that, but these agencies grow in size every year and demand more and more dollars for operational costs and it all sizes up to a calamity of monstrous proportions.

Many of these giant government agencies have morphed into police like organizations and no longer should be considered as service related agencies such as the Forest Service and BLM.

In my humble opinion, the best thing that anyone could do for America is to stop the government from taking the hard earned money from those that work for it and let them spend it anyway they want. Chances are, they will spend a good proportion of that money to create new jobs.

The combination of the countless, and mostly unconstitutional, laws that the Federal and State lawmakers have made, compounded by the myriad of rules and regulations that the multitude of agencies have created, by the unconstitutional “Federal Register” system, has created so much red tape and so many road blocks as to paralyze an entire nation.

Stopping the flow of money to the monster is paramount to our survival, but only by completely dissolving and restarting the federal government will bring our country back to its original greatness. Anything short of this will result in failure.

Sunday, August 9, 2015

Third Party Run; Perhaps our last hope for freedom.

Third Party Run; Perhaps our last hope for freedom.

Overheard one talk show radio host lamenting that Trump threatened to ensure that Hillary would be elected if he didn't get the nomination. Bullshit I say, I didn't see it that way. He had to really make that a stretch.

Now, If the GOP would allow a true, non rhino, patriot to be nominated, then running a third party campaign would be indeed a bad thing to do.

However if the GOP does what I believe they will try so hard to do, and ensure that some damned rhino get the nomination such as Bush, Rubio, or Christie, then yes, running someone as a third party candidate would be the only avenue left for America to do.

To tell you the truth, I really believe that the GOP would much rather have Hillary or even Obama in office than a true patriot and they will work hard to ensure that either a rhino gets the nomination or some Democrat, no matter how bad of a communist or how corrupt they are.

And the reason that they will do this is simple; If you are a corrupt criminal working with other corrupt criminals, they are your friends and cohorts, even if they are on the other side of the party, AND THEY ALL NEED EACH OTHER TO STAY OUT OF PRISON

I think there will be a third party candidate and America had damned well better get over the stupid notion that that will ensure a Democrat in office.

We need to find a way to get all Americans to the voting booths and all voting for the same third party candidate, because  this may very well be our only and last hope to get our freedom back.

Thursday, April 9, 2015

Will the Real Liberals Please Stand Up

Will the Real Liberals Please Stand Up

There was a time when most of us thought that the term “Liberal” was relevant to the term “Freedom” or “Liberty. These early Liberals were brave people willing to stand up to the tyranny of “Dogmatism” and censorship by the far extreme right. Many of these people risked being jailed for what they thought were normal and natural acts and no one’s business but their own. These liberals did much to improve the oppressive hold on the rights and freedoms of the people and are still needed today.

Something happened and today the term liberal has an entirely different meaning to most of us as they are perceived as being anti American and supportive of a totalitarian and overwhelming government which is quite different from the previous standpoint.

In spite of the ongoing and mostly phony battles between the two political parties, there actually still are, I believe, a number of liberals in the world with enough intelligence to not shit in their own nest. These are the people who can still see through the dogma and the slyly contrived disinformation and actually see the forest for the trees.

Unfortunately however, these are the liberals seldom heard as the oppressive din of the progressive movement and their bleating and intellectually challenged minions drown out any common sense fostered from whatever and any source for their own personal agendas.

Anyone with a desire to bring down a power giant such as the USA only need to find the little chinks and cracks and focus the bright spot light of disenchantment on them long enough and feed the uneducated with malicious lies and half truths, will eventually drive a wedge between the, otherwise like minded, people.

Couple this with decades of making people much more reliant on government rather than being self reliant and you have people willing to vote away their very own freedoms for handouts that they have become accustomed to and now demand.

America is being defeated by the oldest trick in the book of warfare; Divide and Conquer.

I really don’t believe that any sane American would give up freedom willingly but have been snowed by those that would use them to destroy our way of life for personal greed.

America needs to know the common enemy in order to unite against them and to stop fighting each other over trivial differences.

Americans also need to know just how close we all are to losing what is so dear to all of us and what the dire consequences are when we do.

Thursday, April 2, 2015

100 years of being defrauded by the FED and the IRS.

Just a little over 100 years ago a group of international thugs from the banking industry cartel convinced Congress, Jeckel Island, to create a central banking system, name it the "Federal Reserve" and give it free reign to operate without any federal oversight.

Shortly after and fearful that the public would catch on to how they were stealing the nations wealth, they created the IRS to try and cover their illicit operations.

But that wasn't enough yet, so they set out to purchase the controlling interests of the news media in order to squelch anyone digging into the nefarious activities of the FED.

Don's just take my word for it, look it up.

Don't you think that after 100 years of being screwed by a couple of rogue agencies, out of your hard earned money and have it used to create over 1600 useless government agencies, that it might be time to say no?

And before you jump on the sleazy and worn wagon of, we need a flat and fair tax, consider this; The Federal government operated a lot better and represented the people a lot better before the IRS was created.

The taxes needed to run the government were already in place and are still in place today.

The problem with the government is not that it has too little money, the problem is that it has too much money.

Friday, September 5, 2014

Newsweek Magazine attacks the President with last issue of magazine.


The liberal Newsweek Magazine is going out of business but not before it attacks the President. Wonderful story!

This is quite an article, even more so when you consider that NEWSWEEK finally had the guts to admit it. WOW!

Newsweek COVER!!! It is their last cover before they fold. Also read the article at the end. AMAZING!!!

Finally, Matt Patterson and Newsweek speak out about Obama. This is timely and tough. As many of you know, Newsweek has a reputation for being extremely liberal. The fact that their editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama and the one that appears in the latest Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event, and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our President and his agenda are starting to trickle through the protective wall built around him by the liberal media...

By Matt Patterson (Newsweek Columnist - Opinion Writer)

Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world's largest economy, direct the world's most powerful military, execute the world's most consequential job?

Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer;" a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, less often did he vote "present"); and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.

He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor;" a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president? There is no evidence that he ever attended or worked for any university or that he ever sat for the Illinois bar. We have no documentation for any of his claims. He may well be the greatest hoax in history.

Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were 'a bit' extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard because of the color of his skin.

Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president ( INSERT my note; half black, not black , that aggravated the topic- especially not descended from US slaves; and the race problem is worse since 2008) and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest?

Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon - affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.

Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if these minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin - that's affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is.

And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.

What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people - conservatives included - ought now to be deeply embarrassed.

The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clich├ęs, and that's when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth - it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years. (An example is his 2012 campaign speeches which are almost word for word his 2008 speeches)

And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. Remember, he wanted the job, campaigned for the task. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerless-ness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. (The other day he actually came out and said no one could have done anything to get our economy and country back on track). But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly? In short: our president is a small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such an impostor in the Oval Office.  ####BTW No reference to his being corrected five times by the Supreme Court - HHS Mandate full case yet to come; illegal use of federal funds to Pl Un-Parenthood for wholesale slaughter of the unborn; and changing HHS Law after it passed, which violates  the US Constitution. And other topics such as gun laws and second amendment which outrages some. and drone-killing of US citizens and indiscriminate killing of citizens in Middle East by drones). Not  settled yet is policy stance on  Syria, Israel and Russia re Ukraine.

PS: Please send this article to all family and friends throughout America and ask them to read and distribute this article to others.